"... In Fort Smith, an officer with a camera was cleared of any wrongdoing in a Nov. fatal shooting after video showed he repeatedly told an armed suspect to drop his weapon. ..." Yahoo
No. The language used above is imprecise.
The *video* showed next-to-nothing. Left ear location of the robocop camera, combined with right handed situation, led to a video that clearly showed a blank wall. Is this going to happened half the time in situations where the robocop needs to take cover?
No, it was the *audio* that allowed one to hear what the officer said.
I'm just pointing out that this "textbook" cases isn't exactly the conceptual design success story as it's being made out to be.